On the June 15, 2011 in riots Vancouver (there was a hockey game going on this day apparently):
0. A very failed prediction on my part:
A chat log with a friend of mine, just before the 5:00pm game:
Him: “Hey, my brother is going downtown to watch the Canucks game, is there going to be rioting in your opinion?”
Me: “Depends who wins!”
Me: “Let’s put it this way, the police will be much more aware of potential rioting so if any starts, it will get stomped down quickly”.
I totally blew that one.
1. Measuring the performance of the Vancouver Police Department depends on what your benchmark was. If the Vancouver Police Department’s mission was the prevention of death, they were very successful. Their strategy appeared to be about the lack of escalation rather than the confrontation of the anarchists. If your measurement was the protection of property, then they failed spectacularly. As usual, they were in a no-win situation. I have no idea whether it would have been feasible for them to charge the crowd that set the initial fire in front of the Canada Post building, but I highly suspect that other media commentators will become instant experts on crowd suppression.
2. The 2011 riots will be processed substantially different than 1994. Digital media was prevalent everywhere and unless if you were wearing a face-mask, facial recognition software will very likely be able to track most people in downtown. If you want an example of this software in action, get a copy of Picasa and get it to index your photographs and you will be very, very afraid. Finding (or at least indexing) the people will be a much more easier task for the police since they will be aided with so much digital media, in combination with recognition software, that will enable them to arrest known offenders (who likely are mostly already with police records).
3. For the first time, I finally “felt” the usefulness of Twitter. It’s sole function in internet life is to act as a global real-time comment aggregator. Gary Mason, former sports columnist turned political commentator, in particular, was quite good. Time to start a Twitter account again…
4. This riot is also a very good demonstration on how few people have to turn socially deviant in order for the fabric of society to be overturned. If they were more organized, they could have also done a lot more damage than they did. For example, just imagine if one of those vehicles got driven into The Bay downtown and then set on fire. The fire suppression systems would have activated, but they are likely not designed with the assumption that people will be lighting up vehicles inside the store. It could have been a lot worse.
5. People that were hanging out at the site of the riot while watching others smash windows and light cars on fire (and taking pictures of all the carnage around them) should be considered as complicit as the people doing the acts themselves, but this was not the case today. I am surprised no journalists got injured.
6. It will be approximately 12 hours before this incident will become political, but after that, you will try to have every politician trying to cash in on this event.
7. One can make inferences about this by looking at the people that participated in the riots. I will comment on the young demographic – if you asked why they were there (at least the people that weren’t smashing up stuff) and got a truthful response, the answer would have likely been a statement on how mundane life ordinarily is. You would have never seen this sort of thing 50 years ago.