Long form census changes

Posted in Commentary on July 14th, 2010 by Sacha Peter

I believe a voluntary long form census would provide statistically useless information simply because of selection bias – it would make the results easy to manipulate by statisticians as they perform “corrections” to this data.

However, I also do not like the argument of the other side that claims that a mandatory census form would result in reliable information. For example, nothing prevents people from just entering in bogus information in an attempt to retain their confidentiality. I am sure people that don’t like intrusive government questions will just give what they believe to be the most politically correct answer, or an answer that is most to be expected of them when they mail in, as opposed to getting truly reliable answers.

In today’s age, I don’t think anybody believes that the government can keep information secure, so expecting a government agency to keep your census return secure for 90 years is not a reasonable expectation. I am not sure how confidential the census data truly is – if they treated the information just like the CRA treats a tax return then at least there is an audit trail for access to that information. Still, you hear occasionally a CRA employee getting fired or charged for improper access of information, so it makes you wonder how many of these cases were settled internally without it being elevated to the public domain.

As such, while the information is desirable to have, the ability to get that information reliably will continue to degrade over the next few decades.

One Response to “Long form census changes”

  1. There is a key difference between CRA records and census survey data, Sacha. The former would be architected to be retrieved by name in order to process, interact with the public, and conduct compliance activities. A GUI would be built that allowed authorized employees to query by relevant elements (and would audit that access in great detail). The census situation is completely different, as the names are segregated from everything else and would not be searchable at all that way. You know about IT; you must surely understand this difference.

Leave a Reply