Twitter the future of journalism?

Posted in Commentary on November 26th, 2009 by Sacha Peter

I noticed on the Pundits’ Guide that when writing about the coverage on the court case dealing with the “in-and-out” case regarding Conservative election expenses in 2006, she mentioned the following:

If you haven’t explored Twitter before, just click on this link: http://twitter.com/CPCvsElxCan, and then scroll down to the bottom of the page, and click on the “More” button. Keep repeating until you get to his first post (or “tweet” as they’re called), and then read upwards to get the detail in chronological order. The hearings have been on for two days already, and continue tomorrow morning. To follow them live, visit the same page, and reload it periodically.

This is the future of journalism, and if you’ve ever found yourself complaining about the lack of detail or substance in mainstream media coverage of a story you care about, then you’ll be pleasantly surprised. Glen does a lot within the 140-character limit each “tweet” is confined to.

I am rather interested in the proceedings of this case, but I found reading it via Twitter was nearly impossible. It reminds me of those websites that take long articles and split them up into 10 sections that you have to click on “next” to read the next paragraph (which is designed that way on purpose to maximize page hits and presumably advertising revenues).

I guess I am just getting too old fashioned on the internet, requiring paragraphs to assimilate information properly. If Twitter is indeed the future of disseminating information, I guess I am about to soon be a dinosaur.

One Response to “Twitter the future of journalism?”

  1. OK, maybe that was a *bit* too strong, but it’s certainly the future of spot news reporting, then.

    During the various end-of-session parliamentary crises-du-semaine, I came to realize that truly the only way to follow the latest news on who was voting which way, and which motion was on the floor, was via Twitter. Even the blogs were falling way behind, and then the stories that hit the media websites, and subsequently the newscasts and newspapers later that day, were all bereft of any vital details for a serious political junkie like me.

    For someone who wants the full details, but doesn’t want to wait for the court transcript, I think Twitter coverage is not too bad at all.

    And for reporting spot news, it’s now the leading edge. Until the next big thing, of course …

    Thanks for the citation.

Leave a Reply