Due to the recent hoopla of the release of Windows Vista, I’ve been looking around for a new laptop. A lot of retailers have been significantly marking down their inventory of old stock (i.e. machines pre-loaded with Windows XP). Since it is nearly impossible to get a laptop without a pre-loaded installation, I might as well get an XP license which of course is included in the purchase price.
I’ve also been doing a bit of research about Windows Vista, and I can’t find anything about it that I would need to upgrade the operating system for. Due to the system architecture, I’ve generally come to the conclusion that Windows Vista is strictly about streaming protected content (read: content that you have to pay for a decryption key) to the user and making sure that they can’t rip the corresponding audio/video stream. I’m also convinced that if this can’t be hacked then Windows XP will likely be the last incarnation of Windows I will be running for a long, long time.
So I managed to find at Staples a Toshiba A100-TA2 notebook. The cost was $769 (plus GST/PST) after I applied a $30 coupon that I managed to find online by doing some basic google searching. The rest of the specs on the thing are fairly standard for a low-end notebook, 1GB RAM, 80GB HDD, Intel integrated video, etc. (Update, February 15, 2007: They actually marked this up to $897 a few days after I bought the thing, I wonder if they made an inventory pricing error.)
The big compromise was the Core Solo processor (at 1.86GHz) opposed to the Core Duo (would have cost $200 more for a 1.73GHz Duo and an extra 40GB HDD capacity). The only difference between these two processors is that the Core Duo has a functioning second CPU on the same die cast, while the solo only has one functioning CPU. In other words, if I do multiprocessing (running two CPU-intensive tasks at the same time) I’ll be a bit stuck, but I have plenty of experience with dual processor systems and the benefits are relatively imperceptible.
What’s rather funny is that a faster clocked Core Solo system can outperform a Core Duo running at a slower clock frequency. The reason why Intel makes Core Solo chips is due to the manufacturing process – if the second CPU core fails testing on the same die, they sever the connection and can still sell the chip instead of throwing it away. This way they get better a manufacturing yield.
All of these CPU performance comparisons are completely useless, since the big constraint in most systems for the past 10 years has been hard drive access times, both the seek times and data transfer speeds. If you don’t run high performance computer games then it’s all a moot point – having a faster CPU doesn’t make you type faster in MS-Word.
I am anticipating that this hardware will last for the next 5 years. Considering that my typical run rate for laptops has historically been two years, this is a rather bold prediction.